Table analysing the proposed measures in the Draghi Report for the energy-extensive industries sector. It is based on seven variabes distributed in columns. The first three are ranking variables where each measure is awarded a score relative to the other measures in its sector or subsector in a hierarchical way: urgency in the EU, importance of the measure for the EU and importance of the measure for Spain. The remaining four variables classify the proposals on the basis of a three-point scale that depends on the assessment of the proposed measure itself: presence in the Mission Letters (explicit reference, ambiguous or no mention at all), political viability for the EU and for Spain (high, medium or low), and level of public investment needed to put the measure in practice (high-susbtantial, medium-little or none-nothing). This will be one of the key sectors for the forthcoming Commission, as envisaged in the new Clean Industrial Deal. 36% of the proposals are explicitly referred to in the Mission Letters, while 64% are mentioned ambiguously. Of the former, only one requires no investment (Political Win), which is stimulating demand for green products with transparency and standardisation measures (65). Two proposals are Quick Wins in terms of the five that have high European viability: first, reinforcing the funding of the decarbonisation of energy-intensive industries, using, among others, revenue from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) (62), and monitoring and improving the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) (64). At one extreme of the energy-intensive industries sector are 36% of the proposals, which require considerable investment, and 45% at the other extreme, which can be implemented without additional capital.