Table analysing the proposed measures in the Draghi Report for refocusing the work of the EU. It is based on seven variabes distributed in columns. The first three are ranking variables where each measure is awarded a score relative to the other measures in its sector or subsector in a hierarchical way: urgency in the EU, importance of the measure for the EU and importance of the measure for Spain. The remaining four variables classify the proposals on the basis of a three-point scale that depends on the assessment of the proposed measure itself: presence in the Mission Letters (explicit reference, ambiguous or no mention at all), political viability for the EU and for Spain (high, medium or low), and level of public investment needed to put the measure in practice (high-susbtantial, medium-little or none-nothing). The Competitiveness Coordination Framework is the Political Win identified in the Draghi proposals for refocusing the work of the EU (deeming this concept to refer to the intersection between explicit presence in the Mission Letters and the absence of public investment). There are no Quick Wins among these proposals, because all have medium viability at the EU level. The Competitiveness Coordination Framework (165) and the EU-wide inquiry into the role of national parliaments (166) are Cheap Wins that would improve the governance of the EU for implementing Draghi’s competitiveness agenda without any need for public investment.