Ratings of Companies’ Self-Reported Progress on AI Elections Accord Pledges

Table with 9 columns and 25 rows.
	1. Provenance	2. Evaluation	3. Detection	4. Response	5. Cross- Industry	6. Transparency	7. Civil society	8. Public education
Adobe	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Amazon	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Anthropic	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Arm*	●				●		●	●
ElevenLabs	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Gen*	●			●	●		●	●
GitHub**	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Google	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
IBM	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Inflection	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Intuit	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
LG AI	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
LinkedIn**	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
McAfee*			●		●		●	●
Microsoft	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Meta	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
NetApp	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Nota	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
OpenAI	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Snapchat	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Stability.ai	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
TikTok	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
Trend Micro*			●		●		●	●
TrueMedia.org*	●		●		●	●	●	●
Truepic*	●		●		●	●	●	●

● Commitment not met or no information provided
● Demonstrated partial satisfaction of commitment per self-report
● Commitment met per self-report

* — Some companies were measured against fewer than eight commitments. This occurs when a company receives a “Not applicable” or “N/A” evaluation for a commitment that does not apply to their company’s products. Zefr is given an N/A for all 8 commitments for the Warner letter only, as it appears that Warner’s office did not include them among reporting requests.
** — Microsoft stated in its responses to the Brennan Center that it was responding on behalf of its subsidiaries, LinkedIn and GitHub. However, both LinkedIn and GitHub appear separately in the accord’s official progress updates.