Table analysing the proposed measures in the Draghi Report for the investment sector. It is based on seven variabes distributed in columns. The first three are ranking variables where each measure is awarded a score relative to the other measures in its sector or subsector in a hierarchical way: urgency in the EU, importance of the measure for the EU and importance of the measure for Spain. The remaining four variables classify the proposals on the basis of a three-point scale that depends on the assessment of the proposed measure itself: presence in the Mission Letters (explicit reference, ambiguous or no mention at all), political viability for the EU and for Spain (high, medium or low), and level of public investment needed to put the measure in practice (high-susbtantial, medium-little or none-nothing). Barring the issuance of a common safe asset to finance joint investment projects (154), all the Investment proposals are Political Wins. This suggests the willingness of the European Commission to implement the reforms and measures suggested by Draghi to improve European competitiveness. By contrast, there are no Quick Wins among the measures put forward. No measure requires additional public investment, because they all entail regulatory changes or the mutualisation of funds.