Table analysing the proposed measures in the Draghi Report for the competition policy sector. It is based on seven variabes distributed in columns. The first three are ranking variables where each measure is awarded a score relative to the other measures in its sector or subsector in a hierarchical way: urgency in the EU, importance of the measure for the EU and importance of the measure for Spain. The remaining four variables classify the proposals on the basis of a three-point scale that depends on the assessment of the proposed measure itself: presence in the Mission Letters (explicit reference, ambiguous or no mention at all), political viability for the EU and for Spain (high, medium or low), and level of public investment needed to put the measure in practice (high-susbtantial, medium-little or none-nothing). Three of the Draghi proposals in the Competition area constitute Political Wins: the control of state aid for industrial policy (158), the reform and expansion of the IPCEIs (159), and the effective application of the Digital Markets Act and the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (161). 40% (four) of the measures are highly viable at the EU level, of which half are also Quick Wins owing to their perceived urgency. None of the Competition measures requires investment, because they involve regulatory changes, which yields four measures as Cheap Wins, all of them previously cited as Political or Quick Wins.